http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/<font color="#000080">挖故事就是勞動文學，也是手腳並用的實踐文學，以及跟挖有關的任何想像</font>waliszh-TW.Text Version 0.958.2004.214walishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/30/430351.htmlSat, 29 Aug 2009 20:01:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/30/430351.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/430351.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/30/430351.html#Feedback1http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/430351.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/430351.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/28/430094.htmlFri, 28 Aug 2009 14:24:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/28/430094.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/430094.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/28/430094.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/430094.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/430094.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/26/429371.htmlWed, 26 Aug 2009 03:10:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/26/429371.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/429371.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/26/429371.html#Feedback4http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/429371.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/429371.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/24/428822.htmlMon, 24 Aug 2009 07:52:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/24/428822.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/428822.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/24/428822.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/428822.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/428822.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/23/428395.htmlSun, 23 Aug 2009 00:07:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/23/428395.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/428395.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/23/428395.html#Feedback6http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/428395.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/428395.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/21/427774.htmlThu, 20 Aug 2009 22:24:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/21/427774.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/427774.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/21/427774.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/427774.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/427774.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/19/427036.htmlWed, 19 Aug 2009 05:02:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/19/427036.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/427036.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/19/427036.html#Feedback8http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/427036.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/427036.html，中時電子報有後續留言與迴響，可一併參觀。九問馬英九「八八風災」救援至今，速度緩慢、決策逆亂、縱橫連繫失據、官員發言不當、無恤災民之苦、官職互諉責任，可謂荒腔走板至極，災區哀鴻遍野，災民情緒幾近失控，全民對政府救災能力信心斲喪，值此非常之際，已經不是幾句口號式的溫情所能彌補於萬一，為今之計，全民只要看到具體、有效的救災、重建時間表，並依時間表]]>walishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/19/426862.htmlTue, 18 Aug 2009 20:48:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/19/426862.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/426862.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/19/426862.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/426862.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/426862.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/17/426420.htmlMon, 17 Aug 2009 15:49:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/17/426420.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/426420.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/17/426420.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/426420.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/426420.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/17/425985.htmlSun, 16 Aug 2009 16:32:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/17/425985.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/425985.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/17/425985.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/425985.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/425985.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/16/425870.htmlSun, 16 Aug 2009 06:29:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/16/425870.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/425870.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/16/425870.html#Feedback4http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/425870.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/425870.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/01/422836.htmlSat, 01 Aug 2009 10:44:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/01/422836.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/422836.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/08/01/422836.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/422836.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/422836.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/07/30/421989.htmlWed, 29 Jul 2009 22:21:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/07/30/421989.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/421989.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/07/30/421989.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/421989.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/421989.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/07/29/421919.htmlWed, 29 Jul 2009 10:39:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/07/29/421919.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/421919.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/07/29/421919.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/421919.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/421919.htmlwalishttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/07/28/421708.htmlTue, 28 Jul 2009 09:24:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/07/28/421708.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/421708.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/archive/2009/07/28/421708.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/comments/commentRss/421708.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/walis/services/trackbacks/421708.html