一直在國外念書的我,對於台灣,香港同性戀
個人主觀認為,以上承認同志婚姻合法化之國
回應... 好複雜 = = 如果
一樣都是人，不分男女，為甚麼結婚一定要是
好，我喜歡你的文 不過，上帝說要告你誹謗
李安2006年OSCAR領獎--影音紀錄 (請開喇叭)
小說原作者在上週六衛報投書痛批奧斯卡 http://books.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1727309,00.html#article_continue
響應世界影迷為斷背山的正名運動 不論 異性戀 還是同性戀 http://davecullen.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=d9ae57c592f826bd7b6980d56fa3ae41&topic=1721.0
........李安志在拿下奧斯卡獎也從小就看的出來，因為台南一中畢業紀念冊中，就畫上了一座奧斯卡獎座。 ...... 是巧合？ 李安高中時青澀的臉孔： http://www.ettoday.com/2006/03/06/11184-1912995.htm
李安把同性戀劇情拍得唯美悽涼, 被許多同性戀者奉為無上神明, 盲目崇拜, 見不得聽不得一絲一毫批評李安或斷袖斷背煽情電影, 口氣甚為不堪 但每個人背景差異看事況心理感受不同 而此屆奧斯卡獎結果也許正暗合許多人心想期望: 李安導演得獎, 但最佳影片不是”斷背山”
Well, that's so very mature. When you are inept and couldn't reason with people, you just start talking nonsense. Good for you.
You will understand when you improve your English. If you have hard time to express yourself or understand, you should use Chinese. Maybe your Chinese is as bad as the minister of Education.
You should understand what people said bebore you comment. I have no problem with Ang Lee when he thanked his friends in China, as you have pointed out. I have no problem with his identifying himself as a Chinese. That's his choice. It is absolutely his right. I just don't understand why he wants to thank EVERYBODY in China. The dictators in Beijing should definitely be condemned, instead of being appreciated.
Oscar misfire: ‘Crash’ and burn By Erik Lundegaard Talk about ruining a perfect evening. Jon Stewart was funny, George Clooney was sharp, Salma Hayek looked to-freakin’-die-for, Philip Seymour Hoffman won in humble-but-lovable fashion and Ang Lee, the director of one of the best movies of the year, became the first non-Caucasian to win the Academy Award for best director. Then Jack Nicholson, presenting the best picture winner, ruined everything. He didn’t say “Brokeback Mountain”; he actually said…“Crash.” No, he didn’t. Did he? He did. My god. This is the worst best picture winner since “The Greatest Show on Earth” in 1952. It may be worse than that. “Greatest Show” was a dull, bloated romance set against the backdrop of a three-ring circus but at least it didn’t pretend to be important. “Crash” thinks it’s important. “Crash” thinks it’s saying something bold about racism in America. But what is it saying? That we all bear some form of racism. That we all “stereotype” other races. That, when pressured, racist sentiments spill out of us as easily as escaped air. Here’s my take. Yes, we all bear some form of racism — that’s obvious. Yes, we all “stereotype” other races in some fashion — that’s obvious. (Particularly obvious in the Los Angeles of “Crash,” where so many characters are stereotypes.) But, no, we don’t easily give voice to our racist sentiments. And that’s why “Crash” rings so false. 更多內容見: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11700333/ http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11700333/page/2/
李安不該得最佳導演獎 而該得最佳 女 導演獎 (看看他的女氣) 希斯雷傑不該得最佳男主角 而該提名最佳女主角 (他還是男人嗎)
李安拍成臥虎, 難道不該感謝中國人嗎 (他和章子怡該互相感謝) 如果李安要拍"臥虎2", 當然還是要去中國拍. 不然要在台灣拍嗎 台灣連中影文化城都沒了
you sure cant understand, Ang Lee is also Chinese. That's why he wants to thank friends in Taiwan, Hong Kong as well as China.
Don't understand why Ang Lee thanked EVERYBODY in China. Didn't the dictators in Beijing just banned his movies?
This is a movie that contributes nothing to the racial issues of LLos Angeles and the movie is nothing but a wicked racism. To garner the multiple racial society in Los Angeles, the movie created an ensemble of feel-good blacks, latinos, persians and whites supposedly living in Los Angeles where I live in. As most Hollywood movies, the characters were so stereotyped, but, appallingly, the Asians were deliberately made wicked. The Asian guy was a smuggler of Asian slaves. The truck load of Asian slaves were released by a black who just robbed a white elte couple. The Asian woman seems so ruthless and cold. That "blaking" was nastily ridiculous. Are the Asians too lame so the producer dared to humiliate them and treated them as a meanless backdrop?
My question is very simple: He is the "best director" while the film is not the best film. Then why is he the best director???????
Crash是部非常棒的影片。 其實，Crash最後脫穎而出，因為出片公司積極拉票的結果。奧斯卡頒獎前，幾位有名的影評人還難以決定最佳影片會獎落誰家。但一致同意，Crash在Academy投票評審之間，非常積極的促銷拉票，這一週的準備期間，各影評家都聽到Crash促銷的Buzz。 所以，輸了，是受商業影響，和同性戀主題關係不大。 在美國以外，Crash，沒那麼用力去推銷，所以斷背山才出頭。 Crash在另外一個影評人團體的評選裡，也打敗斷背山。當時，影評人就說，Crash用廣告宣傳等推銷給影評評審，非常成功。自那此以後，Crash 就積極對奧斯卡的評審推銷。果然有用。 此外，Crash已推出DVD,所以很多人看過，比較有普遍性。斷背山在美國，很多人還沒看過，口碑上會有些影響。
這次奧斯卡的結果就是很政治 得Best Movie的Crash是一部描述Los Angeles族裔問題的電影. Crash大部份的影評都不如Brokeback mountain. 在這部族裔問題的電影裡, 各族裔都有正面的意向. 但對亞裔 的描述都是負面. 男的幹的是販賣人口, 女的視錢如命, 還故意用來戲弄亞裔女人. 奧斯卡是美國的 他是不願見李安拿兩個大獎 do not忘了外國人吃肉 偶爾給我們喝湯.
I wish I know how to quit you.
太棒了!亞洲第一位拿下oscar最佳導演獎，歷史會記錄這一刻................
Breaking no ground Why 'Crash' won, why 'Brokeback' lost and how the academy chose to play it safe. By Kenneth Turan, Times Staff Writer March 5, 2006 Sometimes you win by losing, and nothing has proved what a powerful, taboo-breaking, necessary film "Brokeback Mountain" was more than its loss Sunday night to "Crash" in the Oscar best picture category. Despite all the magazine covers it graced, despite all the red-state theaters it made good money in, despite (or maybe because of) all the jokes late-night talk show hosts made about it, you could not take the pulse of the industry without realizing that this film made a number of people distinctly uncomfortable. More than any other of the nominated films, "Brokeback Mountain" was the one people told me they really didn't feel like seeing, didn't really get, didn't understand the fuss over. Did I really like it, they wanted to know. Yes, I really did. In the privacy of the voting booth, as many political candidates who've led in polls only to lose elections have found out, people are free to act out the unspoken fears and unconscious prejudices that they would never breathe to another soul, or, likely, acknowledge to themselves. And at least this year, that acting out doomed "Brokeback Mountain." For Hollywood, as a whole laundry list of people announced from the podium Sunday night and a lengthy montage of clips tried to emphasize, is a liberal place, a place that prides itself on its progressive agenda. If this were a year when voters had no other palatable options, they might have taken a deep breath and voted for "Brokeback." This year, however, "Crash" was poised to be the spoiler. I do not for one minute question the sincerity and integrity of the people who made "Crash," and I do not question their commitment to wanting a more equal society. But I do question the film they've made. It may be true, as producer Cathy Schulman said in accepting the Oscar for best picture, that this was "one of the most breathtaking and stunning maverick years in American history," but "Crash" is not an example of that.
我被你感動了
打*者為必填欄位