http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/<P><B><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: blue; FONT-FAMILY: 新細明體; mso-bidi-font-family: 新細明體; mso-font-kerning: 0pt"><FONT color=#0000ff><BR>平面媒體非經本作者同意，不得轉載！</FONT></SPAN></B></P>張耀仁zh-TW.Text Version 0.958.2004.214張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2012/02/07/1304560.htmlTue, 07 Feb 2012 03:50:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2012/02/07/1304560.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1304560.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2012/02/07/1304560.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1304560.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1304560.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2012/01/12/1182034.htmlThu, 12 Jan 2012 07:17:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2012/01/12/1182034.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1182034.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2012/01/12/1182034.html#Feedback15http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1182034.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1182034.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2012/01/08/1153989.htmlSun, 08 Jan 2012 02:38:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2012/01/08/1153989.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1153989.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2012/01/08/1153989.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1153989.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1153989.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/12/28/1094798.htmlWed, 28 Dec 2011 03:39:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/12/28/1094798.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1094798.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/12/28/1094798.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1094798.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1094798.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/12/07/1070301.htmlWed, 07 Dec 2011 04:17:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/12/07/1070301.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1070301.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/12/07/1070301.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1070301.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1070301.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/25/1055828.htmlFri, 25 Nov 2011 06:02:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/25/1055828.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1055828.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/25/1055828.html#Feedback17http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1055828.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1055828.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/24/1054005.htmlThu, 24 Nov 2011 04:26:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/24/1054005.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1054005.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/24/1054005.html#Feedback3http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1054005.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1054005.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/21/1048214.htmlMon, 21 Nov 2011 03:32:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/21/1048214.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1048214.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/21/1048214.html#Feedback3http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1048214.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1048214.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/14/1037476.htmlMon, 14 Nov 2011 03:03:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/14/1037476.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1037476.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/14/1037476.html#Feedback4http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1037476.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1037476.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/07/1027789.htmlMon, 07 Nov 2011 03:50:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/07/1027789.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1027789.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/07/1027789.html#Feedback7http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1027789.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1027789.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/03/1022645.htmlThu, 03 Nov 2011 05:57:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/03/1022645.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1022645.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/11/03/1022645.html#Feedback3http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1022645.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1022645.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/10/20/1007069.htmlThu, 20 Oct 2011 07:32:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/10/20/1007069.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/1007069.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/10/20/1007069.html#Feedback6http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/1007069.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/1007069.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/09/15/938058.htmlThu, 15 Sep 2011 03:28:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/09/15/938058.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/938058.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/09/15/938058.html#Feedback5http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/938058.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/938058.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/09/08/923733.htmlThu, 08 Sep 2011 05:09:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/09/08/923733.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/923733.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/09/08/923733.html#Feedback9http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/923733.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/923733.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/08/16/850653.htmlTue, 16 Aug 2011 03:05:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/08/16/850653.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/850653.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/08/16/850653.html#Feedback27http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/850653.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/850653.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/08/05/827878.htmlFri, 05 Aug 2011 07:10:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/08/05/827878.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/827878.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/08/05/827878.html#Feedback3http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/827878.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/827878.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/08/04/824816.htmlThu, 04 Aug 2011 03:25:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/08/04/824816.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/824816.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/08/04/824816.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/824816.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/824816.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/06/20/723811.htmlMon, 20 Jun 2011 02:55:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/06/20/723811.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/723811.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/06/20/723811.html#Feedback5http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/723811.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/723811.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/05/23/691508.htmlMon, 23 May 2011 03:14:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/05/23/691508.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/691508.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/05/23/691508.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/691508.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/691508.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/05/12/680760.htmlThu, 12 May 2011 03:46:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/05/12/680760.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/680760.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/05/12/680760.html#Feedback3http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/680760.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/680760.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/04/01/637447.htmlFri, 01 Apr 2011 04:12:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/04/01/637447.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/637447.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/04/01/637447.html#Feedback4http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/637447.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/637447.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/02/28/615377.htmlMon, 28 Feb 2011 05:13:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/02/28/615377.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/615377.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/02/28/615377.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/615377.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/615377.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/02/25/613790.htmlFri, 25 Feb 2011 03:22:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/02/25/613790.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/613790.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/02/25/613790.html#Feedback3http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/613790.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/613790.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/01/28/603754.htmlFri, 28 Jan 2011 03:09:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/01/28/603754.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/603754.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/01/28/603754.html#Feedback3http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/603754.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/603754.html張耀仁http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/01/24/602586.htmlMon, 24 Jan 2011 04:07:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/01/24/602586.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/602586.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/archive/2011/01/24/602586.html#Feedback5http://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/comments/commentRss/602586.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/rennychang/services/trackbacks/602586.html