http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/<font color="#ffff00">我們無法脫離意義而活，符號是意義的監獄，文字是符號的集叢，故我們都活在文字監獄中</font>陳南宗zh-TW.Text Version 0.958.2004.214陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/06/21/413500.htmlSun, 21 Jun 2009 13:38:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/06/21/413500.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/413500.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/06/21/413500.html#Feedback6http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/413500.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/413500.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/06/07/410231.htmlSun, 07 Jun 2009 14:38:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/06/07/410231.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/410231.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/06/07/410231.html#Feedback22http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/410231.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/410231.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/05/24/407097.htmlSun, 24 May 2009 14:33:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/05/24/407097.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/407097.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/05/24/407097.html#Feedback18http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/407097.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/407097.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/04/22/397715.htmlWed, 22 Apr 2009 02:21:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/04/22/397715.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/397715.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2009/04/22/397715.html#Feedback16http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/397715.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/397715.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/08/04/305547.htmlMon, 04 Aug 2008 05:56:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/08/04/305547.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/305547.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/08/04/305547.html#Feedback19http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/305547.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/305547.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/07/17/299513.htmlThu, 17 Jul 2008 04:16:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/07/17/299513.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/299513.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/07/17/299513.html#Feedback8http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/299513.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/299513.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/07/16/299276.htmlWed, 16 Jul 2008 06:06:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/07/16/299276.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/299276.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/07/16/299276.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/299276.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/299276.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/06/26/292165.htmlThu, 26 Jun 2008 02:54:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/06/26/292165.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/292165.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/06/26/292165.html#Feedback8http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/292165.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/292165.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/05/06/276018.htmlTue, 06 May 2008 07:27:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/05/06/276018.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/276018.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2008/05/06/276018.html#Feedback20http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/276018.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/276018.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/29/221821.htmlThu, 29 Nov 2007 09:42:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/29/221821.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/221821.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/29/221821.html#Feedback9http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/221821.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/221821.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/23/219636.htmlFri, 23 Nov 2007 06:44:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/23/219636.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/219636.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/23/219636.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/219636.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/219636.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/15/217196.htmlThu, 15 Nov 2007 04:26:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/15/217196.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/217196.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/15/217196.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/217196.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/217196.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/12/216185.htmlMon, 12 Nov 2007 00:57:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/12/216185.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/216185.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/12/216185.html#Feedback18http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/216185.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/216185.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/08/215099.htmlThu, 08 Nov 2007 05:00:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/08/215099.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/215099.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/08/215099.html#Feedback5http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/215099.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/215099.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/01/213112.htmlThu, 01 Nov 2007 13:34:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/01/213112.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/213112.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/11/01/213112.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/213112.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/213112.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/10/27/211347.htmlSat, 27 Oct 2007 07:19:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/10/27/211347.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/211347.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/10/27/211347.html#Feedback6http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/211347.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/211347.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/10/10/205109.htmlWed, 10 Oct 2007 03:30:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/10/10/205109.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/205109.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/10/10/205109.html#Feedback25http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/205109.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/205109.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/10/03/202960.htmlWed, 03 Oct 2007 10:34:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/10/03/202960.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/202960.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/10/03/202960.html#Feedback9http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/202960.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/202960.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/27/200838.htmlThu, 27 Sep 2007 09:11:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/27/200838.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/200838.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/27/200838.html#Feedback6http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/200838.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/200838.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/12/197328.htmlWed, 12 Sep 2007 09:30:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/12/197328.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/197328.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/12/197328.html#Feedback39http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/197328.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/197328.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/05/194975.htmlWed, 05 Sep 2007 15:24:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/05/194975.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/194975.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/05/194975.html#Feedback8http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/194975.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/194975.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/04/194644.htmlTue, 04 Sep 2007 09:59:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/04/194644.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/194644.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/09/04/194644.html#Feedback19http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/194644.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/194644.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/08/30/193178.htmlThu, 30 Aug 2007 10:29:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/08/30/193178.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/193178.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/08/30/193178.html#Feedback10http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/193178.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/193178.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/08/29/192832.htmlWed, 29 Aug 2007 07:45:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/08/29/192832.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/192832.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/08/29/192832.html#Feedback11http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/192832.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/192832.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/08/23/191374.htmlThu, 23 Aug 2007 10:43:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/08/23/191374.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/191374.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2007/08/23/191374.html#Feedback19http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/191374.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/191374.html