http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/<font color="#ffff00">我們無法脫離意義而活，符號是意義的監獄，文字是符號的集叢，故我們都活在文字監獄中</font>陳南宗zh-TW.Text Version 0.958.2004.214陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/09/07/536331.htmlTue, 07 Sep 2010 05:14:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/09/07/536331.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/536331.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/09/07/536331.html#Feedback6http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/536331.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/536331.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2011/10/07/987496.htmlFri, 07 Oct 2011 03:02:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2011/10/07/987496.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/987496.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2011/10/07/987496.html#Feedback3http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/987496.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/987496.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2011/10/06/983426.htmlThu, 06 Oct 2011 02:00:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2011/10/06/983426.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/983426.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2011/10/06/983426.html#Feedback1http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/983426.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/983426.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2011/04/18/653079.htmlMon, 18 Apr 2011 03:15:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2011/04/18/653079.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/653079.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2011/04/18/653079.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/653079.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/653079.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/12/08/577551.htmlWed, 08 Dec 2010 01:51:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/12/08/577551.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/577551.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/12/08/577551.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/577551.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/577551.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/12/03/574810.htmlFri, 03 Dec 2010 05:38:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/12/03/574810.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/574810.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/12/03/574810.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/574810.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/574810.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/30/572927.htmlTue, 30 Nov 2010 05:05:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/30/572927.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/572927.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/30/572927.html#Feedback3http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/572927.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/572927.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/25/570361.htmlThu, 25 Nov 2010 07:59:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/25/570361.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/570361.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/25/570361.html#Feedback9http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/570361.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/570361.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/23/569085.htmlTue, 23 Nov 2010 07:45:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/23/569085.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/569085.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/23/569085.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/569085.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/569085.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/21/568051.htmlSun, 21 Nov 2010 07:08:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/21/568051.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/568051.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/21/568051.html#Feedback15http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/568051.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/568051.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/06/558955.htmlSat, 06 Nov 2010 06:32:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/06/558955.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/558955.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/06/558955.html#Feedback7http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/558955.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/558955.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/03/557135.htmlWed, 03 Nov 2010 07:42:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/03/557135.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/557135.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/11/03/557135.html#Feedback10http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/557135.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/557135.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/12/548054.htmlTue, 12 Oct 2010 02:02:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/12/548054.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/548054.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/12/548054.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/548054.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/548054.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/10/547388.htmlSun, 10 Oct 2010 02:24:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/10/547388.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/547388.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/10/547388.html#Feedback7http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/547388.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/547388.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/08/546815.htmlFri, 08 Oct 2010 10:02:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/08/546815.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/546815.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/08/546815.html#Feedback23http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/546815.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/546815.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/07/546296.htmlThu, 07 Oct 2010 05:26:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/07/546296.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/546296.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/07/546296.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/546296.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/546296.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/05/545465.htmlTue, 05 Oct 2010 04:43:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/05/545465.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/545465.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/05/545465.html#Feedback4http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/545465.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/545465.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/01/544028.htmlFri, 01 Oct 2010 07:27:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/01/544028.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/544028.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/10/01/544028.html#Feedback10http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/544028.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/544028.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/09/27/542584.htmlMon, 27 Sep 2010 09:10:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/09/27/542584.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/542584.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/09/27/542584.html#Feedback16http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/542584.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/542584.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/09/14/538778.htmlTue, 14 Sep 2010 05:45:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/09/14/538778.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/538778.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/09/14/538778.html#Feedback4http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/538778.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/538778.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/23/531417.htmlMon, 23 Aug 2010 07:54:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/23/531417.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/531417.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/23/531417.html#Feedback0http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/531417.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/531417.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/16/529210.htmlMon, 16 Aug 2010 01:23:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/16/529210.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/529210.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/16/529210.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/529210.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/529210.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/13/528482.htmlFri, 13 Aug 2010 05:05:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/13/528482.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/528482.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/13/528482.html#Feedback9http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/528482.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/528482.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/12/527863.htmlThu, 12 Aug 2010 01:41:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/12/527863.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/527863.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/12/527863.html#Feedback11http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/527863.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/527863.html陳南宗http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/11/527616.htmlWed, 11 Aug 2010 05:45:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/11/527616.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/527616.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/archive/2010/08/11/527616.html#Feedback10http://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/comments/commentRss/527616.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/pecker/services/trackbacks/527616.html