News 2.0
工作室

手握修羅刀,足證菩薩道
野武士信條:承諾、道義和信任


關於黃創夏
│訂閱黃創夏 RSS 2.0 Feed
文章 - 461, 迴響 - 18488, 引用 - 0, 本格總瀏覽人次 - 1946852
中時電子報 › 中時部落格 › 來賓所有格總覽 › 黃創夏

文章分類

推薦連結

老婆大人的部落格

最新文章

最新迴響

再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

2007-12-10 22:06迴響:18點閱:3246

●我永遠相信,一個在威權壓力下,肯犧牲、有理想的團體,就算一時被某些領導者背叛了,他們還是會在最後關頭,從理念、從信念出發,做出雖然無奈,但是對大局最好的抉擇。

能讓民進黨垮到底嗎?民進黨目前檯面上呼風喚雨的人物,也不過才數百個人而已。但民進黨員可有幾十萬人,支持民進黨過的公民,可有數百萬台灣人啊!能眼睜睜地看著數十年淚水和汗水終將付諸東流嗎?

自清、自重,掃掉腐朽,才有新芽重生空間,才會得到公民的再認同,一個徹底垮掉的政黨,卻留下一個毫無壓力的新執政黨,少了制衡,民主仍危險啊!權力越大,腐化更快,歷史鐵律,歷歷在目。

更何況,台灣人不分藍綠都有解決問題的能力,中共才會怕,他們才會學習,怎樣不能再用中國特別痛恨的帝國主義霸道姿態,壓迫台灣。這樣子,兩岸才有可能攜手找到解決歷史課題的契機。

《[本原發表於中時電子報2006/09/15『網路主筆室』》

那些自稱「愛台灣」、「本土」、「正綠」的朋友們,能不能換一個角度來面對倒扁風潮?因為,反對陳水扁的社會運動,可以導向成為:以民主實踐鞏固台灣民族尊嚴。

自稱是「綠軍」的許多朋友都在擔心:會不會讓中國共產黨趁機得利,當權派更是用這個理由到處在幫人戴上「紅帽子」。

這種「戴帽子」說穿了,是自欺欺人,夜間吹口哨,還是那種「藍/綠」、「愛台灣/不愛台灣」的「敵我意識」之「化約主義」,實在懶得再理這些藉由「仇恨」換取利益的政客。

但從國際關係角度看,其實,人民反對不當執政者,越有力量,才更可能是正港的愛台灣,因為,要是能在「藍/綠」雙邊夾殺中,逐漸成長成一股超脫在純政治部門「藍/綠」板塊,能代表社會「第三部門」的「新勢力」,台灣,反而因為有更紮實的民主機制,台灣人民的主體性更確定,更有和中國「平等」對話的機會。

「綠色」的朋友請安心,有人擔心:越戰期間,也曾有「阮文紹下台,共產黨不來」之呼聲,但南越還是赤化了;一九四九年前在中國,也曾有「蔣介石下台,共產黨不來」,中國還是赤化了。

那是在上世紀的冷戰時代,因為背後有美蘇爭霸,他們更具體介入,甚至派軍隊介入,許多國家因為內爭,讓美蘇可以操弄,因而淪入共產黨之手,如南越。但二十一世紀的現在,美國已經獨強,台灣更沒有美、中的軍隊直接介入,並不會因此變成南越。

更要正視的是,中國正想要發展綜合國力,先融入國際社會為基本國策時代,所以,國際關係上都很清楚的分析:中國當前和美的基本國策是:「鬥而不破、彎弓不射箭」,也就是,雙方會競爭,但不會撕破臉。

趁著美、中之間的恐怖平衡,誰也不敢先動手觸怒對方時,台灣的機會,反而就在此短暫的美、中抗衡中。

對內來看,在「藍/綠」僵局中,新勢力如果真能以意志力撐出一片天,成為「非政治」的「公民社會」力量,將來,才可能持續發揮影響力,迫使「藍」和「綠」都必須和他們呼應,台灣才可能有產生「仲裁機制」,如此才能讓台灣污濁陰黯的政治天空,晴天再現,光明有機會降臨。

但台灣想要在內、外都要追尋光明,首先要面對的問題就是,陳水扁如果繼續主導,台灣絕對會繼續內亂。但是,藉由具有主體性公民社會解決陳水扁問題,且台灣人民能以民主原則為框架中處理掉這個問題,中國和美國都不可能因此干預內政。

陳水扁倒底該不該下台?可以用兩個角度來看待:

第一:貪腐,是指「貪污」和「腐敗」,貪污是A了錢,腐敗則是濫了權。這六年以來,陳水扁最大的問題是,讓「非正式權力」凌駕了「正式權力」,不是合於政府體制或經過人民"合法授權"的人,竟然指揮起國家機器,國家空轉的真正原因就在此。

就以「國務機要發票案」為例吧,有沒有A錢,也許很多人說要讓司法決定,但陳水扁竟說有他「直屬」的「秘密情報員」,這就是「濫權」了,民主國家的總統,竟然有「非體制」的「特務」,問題其實比「A錢」更不可思議。如果陳水扁的說法可以成立,他真的這樣幹,已經是比蔣介石更專擅、濫權了,台灣人民還接受這樣的統治者,台灣,將從此不能再稱是「民主國家」了。

第二、政黨輪替之後,和民進黨墮落一樣驚人的,是國民黨的毫不長進也一樣讓人吃驚,馬英九因為對比當權者的「無恥」,竟可能 「躺」著進總統府!

全世界的政治人物,像新加坡、德國、日本、英國等國家「廉潔」是基本要求,竟然成為馬英九的「優勢」,這才是台灣真正悲哀,台灣未來的大危機在於,一個幾乎沒太多進步的「國民黨」,竟然就要「騎上京城」了,就要班師回朝了。

反觀民進黨,所有人都知道,未來可見的選舉中,民進黨鐵定會持續地大敗,濫黨獨大」的時代再度降臨,對台灣的發展,怎麼可能會是好事呢?

所以,「綠色」的朋友請換個角度想:台灣人民施壓、吶喊的真正目的,是為了要讓民進黨早日和扁切割,讓民進黨中還有「良知」的人物,能夠搭上台灣人民搭建起來的舞台,找到扮演「高華德」的正當性,留下民進黨的命脈

「綠色」的朋友們:台灣現在的局面已經是:

阿扁不下台,中共可能來:因為陳水扁被弊案纏身,已經不可能再「合理」治理國家了,一個高達六成的堅定反對聲浪,卻祇有不到二成支持的執政者,誰都知道,台灣必然會繼續空轉和內耗,但對岸,中國繼續發展,終究會拉開和台灣的差距。

這樣子,有朝一日,中國自信心更強了,想要和美國爭一爭霸了,台灣,難道不會成為中國和美國示威的「祭品」嗎?

阿扁能下台,中共不敢來:因為台灣人民的主體性,將會迎合世界主流國家的價值觀,台灣人民證明了有能力解決自己的問題,而且主體性更彰顯,中國,反而找不到"侵略"台灣的藉口。

秋風起,蟬聲鳴,倒扁,是以民主實踐鞏固台灣民族尊嚴。許多衷心愛台灣的台灣人民都已經聽到了,「綠色」的朋友們,你們也聽到了嗎?

 

                                                        《回首頁

加入書籤:         
引用:http://blog.chinatimes.com/karl6406/archive/2007/12/10/225461.html
2007-12-10 22:06作者:黃創夏分類:以扁為鑑迴響:18點閱:3246

迴響與引用列表

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

沒有阿扁,中共就沒勁兒!

2007-12-12 10:18 911

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

創夏君:
這陣子我恰巧有長一些的時間和閒情逛入中時部落
格,最先進入古典音樂,然後宗教、電影、小小文學,最多的是政治,因為關心不定的未來,我愛臺灣。
今天坐坐歇歇,在電腦前最久了。我不懂複雜的政治運作;今天讀報,愈讀愈心焦。訝然發覺一切都糊塗起來!只有兩個清晰:
1.反對辦入聯公投,那是大賭,險棋。
2.立法院未來? ……?怎樣投票才好?
James 先生對 "TVBS 2100" 節目的提議,您是不是也有想過?藉節目讓人民知道"法治民主"的常議識。全民有這些知識基礎才能覺醒和判斷,配合有理念理想的政治家走向理性優質民主,而不盲從隨政客的操作團團轉。
我不知道目前適不適合,會不會挑出"制憲"大風波,讓總統"打蛇隨棍上",又混亂視聽一番。現在我覺得難以再信任他了。他好像喜歡聲東擊西,一石數鳥。
您也有上2100節目,知道李濤先生有注意到James先生的話嗎?
啊呀!我得離開了,快要變"人機複合體"了!
您最近定又忙得不可開交,請注意健康!

2007-12-11 15:59 joyce

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

Dear James,
I guess you are a foreigner, really? Thank you so much for concernig us. I agree your suggestion about the discussions in the "TVBS 2100 show". It is really good. Hope Mr. Lee Tao has already noticed you words.

2007-12-11 15:09 joyce

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

Frances,

Appreciate your kind words on my comments. I would love to organize this particular action in Taiwan, however, my work in the United States would not allow me to do so. That's why I kept sending emails to Mr. Huang, hoping that he can bring up to Mr. Lee Tao for further discussions in the "TVBS 2100 show", to get more people involved, and maybe a retired prosecutor, judge or even a law school student in Taiwan can actually file this law suit!

2007-12-11 11:26 James

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

i think we expect too much of article writer mr. huang. no one can play so many roles to make our country better single handedly. i would feel very pressured if i were him with all these expectations from many. i believe he works hard enough and we should let him concentrate on playing this role he does best; a powerful pen with conscience. hopefully some of us got woken up and others get more informed or inspired and we all take small or big (if you can) actions to ensure some positive changes happen. i.e. even just by talking to your friends/families/neighbours to spread the influence.

To James: very impressed by your clear and precise action plan, any chance for you to initiate and organize this in taiwan?

2007-12-11 11:08 frances

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來


這一貼,必定是言簡意賅,俗辣小人物要建議黃主筆,人生苦短,青春有限,是不是應該拿有用之力,來作金石之擊

認識您的人一定不少,您可以做俗辣想做卻做不到的事,那就是訪問“學者”,各方面的“學者”,真正的“學者”,替台灣抓出制度上的病灶,下一些治病的帖藥,盧列出政治判例的異同,指出法制上一體適用的方針,這是頑廉懦立的根本

若不以此之圖,則今日醜人為惡,必見他日帥哥食人,人物攻訐,黨同伐異真真可以休矣

第三勢力不是沒有,卻無丁點論述之功,徒以選舉為尚,起腳之始,俗辣已可預見其顛仆之時

謹此


2007-12-11 10:27 只是俗辣

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

Joyce,

To get started, all you need is to have one citizen or a group of citizens, whether experienced lawyer or not, to file a law suit in the court on this specific issue, because his or her constitutional right is to be violated! Please note that the citizens are the real owners of the republic, not the politicians.

It certainly will not hurt if the TV talk shows will devote some time to further discuss and educate people on this case!

2007-12-11 10:20 James

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

James 君這一句:
"Citizens should ask the High Court to postpone the referendum vote until a complete solution can be reached."
若然確切可行,怎樣行動呢?民衆目前是散沙,媒體能發動網上公民連署麼?

2007-12-11 09:50 joyce lin

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

"公民社會",
"祭品",
好精釆的用詞,貼切極了!

2007-12-11 09:27 joyce

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

阿扁只剩3個月就要下台了啊
它這隻碩鼠是最大的問題嗎?

最大的問題是那個民進黨被挾持了
就算阿扁下台
一樣是這樣的方式對付台灣

因為我想(有力人士)還在那裡
不斷的替那個黨出主義稱腰起鬨呢

不然
怎麼會這麼肆無忌憚的
一而再再而三的
又貪又腐又亂政呢?

2007-12-11 08:53 六月雪

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

Mr. Huang,

As I mentioned on your blog a few days ago, Taiwan's best and the only weapon to keep itself independent from Communist China is a complete democracy that is ruled by law. Neither United States, nor Japan, will fight Communist China for Taiwan. China now has not only short-range missiles aimed at Taiwan, but also has long-range missiles with nuclear warheads that can reach Washington D.C.. Will you take the risk of being nuked to fight against Communist China for Taiwan, if you were the President of the United States? In the event of war, Taiwan may win some battles with the logistic help from U.S. and/or Japan, but Taiwan will lose the war as everything on this beautuful island will be destroyed. If you think that the "921" earthquack was devastating, you haven't seen anything yet! So having a war with Communist China is an absolutely "NO" under ANY circumstances. This analysis has nothing to do with if you are "man" enough or not, but a cool and undeniable fact!

Communist system can be defeated, not militarily, but by a better and more superior political system called "democracy on the basis of law". With this superior political system, Taiwan will force Communist China to change, just like how Communist China was forced to change economically! With this superior political system, Taiwan can even challenge Communist China that Taiwan will allow the candidate from Communist Party to participate in Taiwan's presidential election (of course, to be voted only by people in Taiwan) if they would allow candidates from Taiwan to participate in theirs (to be voted only by people on mainland). How do you know if candidates from KMT or DPP would not win on mainland China? Under this scenario, in theory, Taiwan has nothing to lose but has everything to gain. The question is if Taiwan is confident enough to do so. If not, then Taiwan's democracy must not be a real one.

Taiwan's biggest danger today is not the bad economy, but the constant lies and illegal actions from the top officials. Although these top officials today are from DPP, they can easily come from KMT or some other political parties tomorrow. It is the responsibility of media and citizen civil-right groups to stop these lies or illegal actions by bringing them to the court. Don't just TALK about on your blogs, but bring up to your "TVBS 2100 show" for real and feasible actions. There must be a lot of good lawyers who are willing to take on these cases for the good of the society for free. For example, the Central Election Committee's decision about the "1-stop" approach for the referendum voting on 1/12 election is clearly a violation of voters' constitutional right. Voters should have right to take or not to take one or both referendum ballots in a completely secured and private environment. The CEC needs to explan in the High Court as to how its "1-stop" approach is not going to violate this constitutional right. Citizens should ask the High Court to postpone the referendum vote until a complete solution can be reached. At meantime, the voting for Congress can continue on 1/12 as scheduled. Why is everybody just so worrying about but nobody has taken any legal actions? This has nothing to do with either "blue" or "green", but everything to do with your very constitutional rights. If you don't defend your own rights, I guess you shouldn't expect politicians to defend for you.

Taiwan's media needs to start educating people about what their fundamental rights are, then the media and people together must do everything possible to build up an independent judiciary system to cement the democracy. Citizens in Taiwan must have clear understanding that the executive power has to be examined by people at all time, and only the good and competent officials/party get rewarded with a second term, and the rotation of parties in power once every 4 or 8 years is the best protection the citizens can have, so that they don't need to face another dictatorship.

There are so many detailed steps can be taken to enhance the judiciary system, to make it better and more credible. All you need to do is to look around at more advanced socirties, such as U.S., Japan, U.K., etc.., If other countries can do it, Taiwan certainly can do it too.

Taiwan's future does not lie with any given persons, but with a true demoncratic system on the basis of law. People come and go, especially under the power rotation scenario, so it has to be the system to protect all citizens from going backward.

2007-12-11 08:47 James

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

great article to let people see clearly the real and just cause/ purpose of this movement.
although i am still not sure why so many Taiwanse still believe we can/should take advantage of the power struggle/balancing acts between PRC and US in order to survive and prosper.
American government plays two hands cards so they can benifit hugely from selling us overpriced weapons, not because they love and care about us or our so called democratic country.
We will win more international support from other countries from non government organizations' efforts and that's crucial.
Let the whole world know about what Taiwanese are doing and how they are living and most importantly our contributions to the world as a global citizen, as much as we can (not just inward looking, but look outside ), preferrably not political stuff as it shouldnt' be the vital part of our life and i am really sick of our congress people often have physical fights instead of using words and such violence shown on tv news in foreign countries, Taiwanese democracy has besome such a joke to many when those politicians show so little respect to the basic idea of it : respect or tolerance towards different opinions.

If PRC has any respect towards taiwan; that's our past economic achievement (and sadly to say it was mostly achieved during little Chiang's era) and we have lost it since ex president lee took power) which they felt they might be able to copy...but so far our so called democracy has proven to them it's nothing to be proud of except being unproductive to the development of a country. Yes their people would love to be able to freely criticize their leader/government and officials the way we can, but you think their government would ever want that?
Time sometimes is the best solution to problems and this might be the case; when their old generation within their government die off, attitudes toward Taiwan will change quite a bit as nowadays young Chinese think very differently and more acceptable to western ideas/culture.

although i would like to believe PRC doesnt' really want to take over taiwan by force- as they could have had done that if they really wanted to long ago, as long as they don't feel they get pushed to the corner that they will just have to do something to prove their "ownership".

I also believe American style democracy is not really the only nor the best example for our future as we all see how many serious problems they are facing even under a system much more advanced than ours.
Social democratic might be the way to go although there is no perfect political system to fit all so Taiwanese (and Chinese as well ) need to develop our own which is a very complciated issue. i don't know enough to say anything in this area as I don't read serious books ( only one week ago, the only daily question requiring my thinking was what's for dinner tonight ) so I often express my opinions based on my intuitions, without good theories or facts to back them up - although sometimes my instincts speaks to me more clearly than confusing myself with lots of schools of thoughts. So here is the simple thought from a simple minded house wife as we stay home mum should also have Our voices heard (sorry, not sure if there is any other stay home mum join me here)
got to go to kids' school for parent help now

2007-12-11 06:40 frances

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

貪腐無能一肚子壞水的馬英九 紅衫蛆 怎麼不出來反一反?

2007-12-11 06:16 you are a dumb ass

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

真是無奈~整整忍受快8年.這7年多來我只要聽到電視上有那扁丑的台灣國~語的鴨叫聲我就急忙轉台.
真是老狗們玩不出新把戲.還是來這套!
民進黨老把戲~
1.翻舊帳~為何不幫日據時代受難家屬向日本泛舊帳
2.聯合簽名掛保證~無恥政客老把戲
3.撕裂社會~現在誰還會分誰是本省誰是外省
4.蠢人台獨主義~沒革命保證3-5代後還是不成功
5.能A就A~執政前一套執政後見錢眼開
6.實在罄竹........
這些假台獨假民主的政權還有三X電視鄭XX這個守財奴一直在辯護~~
實在看不下去~~~
台灣阿!台灣!
想哭哭不出來!!

2007-12-11 05:10 夜叫獸

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

█擲
█地
█有
█聲
█!

2007-12-11 04:12 yenichang

總是拿蔣介石來墊背, 台灣會真的覺醒嗎

蔣介石的功過,由時間來評價....
人民該做的, 只是當下!!

2007-12-11 01:49 melodiec

馬英九躺著進總統府了嗎??

你很侮辱人也...!!
人家沒有努力嗎??
本人非常希望馬英九退選....
中共進來...才是台灣人民的福氣...
絕不是藍色的人...和北京綠色台商們聊聊天就知道台灣不抓住兩制機會...是很不智的, 聊完, 他們就去打小白球了...留下了一陣驚愕!!
對現今和未來可能的中國大陸...您了解嗎?
台灣的民主...我承認, 做到了人民可以亂罵...但是罵了之後呢? 更顯獨裁!!

2007-12-11 01:37 melodiec

回應: 再談:阿扁下台,中共不來

黃先生﹕

本人時常閱覽你的文章與” 被“採訪﹑非常佩服你那獨特的見解。對于此篇“再談:阿扁下台,中共不來” 的呼籲﹑也深表同感。希望你能更進一步﹑聯絡召集一批有理想﹑有研究而又無野心之有識之士﹑一同向全臺灣的同胞提出一套叫得響﹑追求得到的治國教育方案﹑來凝聚改革力量。不然光光換個領導人﹑輪替一下失去理念或不能實踐理念的政黨﹑也是于事無補。

民主的方法是選舉﹑制衡﹐但它的精神不在于此。事實上民主不是人民當家作主﹑那是不實際的口號﹑不然為什麼要有議員﹑官員等所謂領袖們來代理。其實真正的民主的目的是民本。民主的基本要求是人民的全面素質。有罪性的人﹑不管是在那裡都會”引“起罪惡。在一個家﹑在一個黨﹑在一個職位都能帶來禍害。

本人在美已有四十餘年﹑對與美國的民主作業也有一點了解。美國的民主表面上似乎非常進步﹑成功。其實它的主要因素是她有基督教精神理念作為支撐。選的人有此本質﹑被選的人也有如此的本質。所以人到了行政﹑有好的行政﹐人到了立法﹑有好的法律與守法。沒有這些本質﹑就算是美國民主制度完善也會淪為分贓式的利益鬥爭。

我們要求領導人﹑要求政黨﹑其實就是要求自己。人民的素質不能提昇﹑要求領導人﹑要求政黨提昇是辦不到的。社會改革要在政治改革之先。期望教育人民的素質工作﹑也能成為你終生事業的一部分。

謝謝你能看完此篇心意。即祝

時祺

謝國建敬上
Huntington Beach. CA.

2007-12-11 00:56 謝國建

回應這篇文章

*者為必填欄位

*回應標題:
*姓名 / 暱稱:
*E-Mail:
您的網站:
*回應內容:  
*驗證:
請輸入上圖六位數字驗證碼:

 
2007年12月
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345

banner14657_03.gifbanner135135_ecash.jpgfree146x57.jpg

編輯部落格最新文章

作家部落格最新文章

來賓部落格最新文章

旅遊部落格最新文章

財經部落格最新文章

電影部落格最新文章

體育部落格最新文章

音樂部落格最新文章

美食部落格最新文章

公益部落格最新文章

數位部落格最新文章