http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/<font color="#ffff00">我的散文、短篇、思索性短文</font>張復zh-TW.Text Version 0.958.2004.214張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2008/05/09/277097.htmlFri, 09 May 2008 08:27:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2008/05/09/277097.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/277097.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2008/05/09/277097.html#Feedback4http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/277097.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/277097.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2008/05/04/275421.htmlSun, 04 May 2008 07:38:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2008/05/04/275421.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/275421.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2008/05/04/275421.html#Feedback2http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/275421.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/275421.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2008/01/28/240223.htmlMon, 28 Jan 2008 07:13:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2008/01/28/240223.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/240223.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2008/01/28/240223.html#Feedback10http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/240223.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/240223.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/11/01/212960.htmlThu, 01 Nov 2007 04:31:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/11/01/212960.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/212960.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/11/01/212960.html#Feedback15http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/212960.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/212960.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/09/24/200211.htmlMon, 24 Sep 2007 05:03:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/09/24/200211.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/200211.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/09/24/200211.html#Feedback5http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/200211.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/200211.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/09/11/196828.htmlTue, 11 Sep 2007 06:36:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/09/11/196828.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/196828.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/09/11/196828.html#Feedback16http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/196828.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/196828.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/09/06/195156.htmlThu, 06 Sep 2007 06:20:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/09/06/195156.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/195156.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/09/06/195156.html#Feedback20http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/195156.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/195156.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/08/02/186134.htmlThu, 02 Aug 2007 09:43:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/08/02/186134.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/186134.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/08/02/186134.html#Feedback8http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/186134.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/186134.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/07/24/183615.htmlTue, 24 Jul 2007 06:16:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/07/24/183615.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/183615.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/07/24/183615.html#Feedback12http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/183615.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/183615.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/06/30/177718.htmlSat, 30 Jun 2007 06:55:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/06/30/177718.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/177718.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/06/30/177718.html#Feedback8http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/177718.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/177718.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/06/18/174818.htmlMon, 18 Jun 2007 05:40:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/06/18/174818.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/174818.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/06/18/174818.html#Feedback4http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/174818.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/174818.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/05/24/169120.htmlThu, 24 May 2007 07:57:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/05/24/169120.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/169120.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/05/24/169120.html#Feedback14http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/169120.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/169120.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/05/11/166170.htmlFri, 11 May 2007 08:00:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/05/11/166170.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/166170.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/05/11/166170.html#Feedback3http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/166170.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/166170.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/05/06/164356.htmlSat, 05 May 2007 19:55:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/05/06/164356.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/164356.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/05/06/164356.html#Feedback1http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/164356.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/164356.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/04/27/161226.htmlFri, 27 Apr 2007 06:03:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/04/27/161226.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/161226.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/04/27/161226.html#Feedback3http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/161226.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/161226.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/04/14/158836.htmlSat, 14 Apr 2007 08:34:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/04/14/158836.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/158836.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/04/14/158836.html#Feedback12http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/158836.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/158836.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/04/04/157001.htmlWed, 04 Apr 2007 01:57:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/04/04/157001.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/157001.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/04/04/157001.html#Feedback10http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/157001.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/157001.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/02/13/148933.htmlTue, 13 Feb 2007 07:19:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/02/13/148933.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/148933.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/02/13/148933.html#Feedback16http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/148933.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/148933.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/02/05/147529.htmlSun, 04 Feb 2007 23:54:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/02/05/147529.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/147529.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/02/05/147529.html#Feedback10http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/147529.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/147529.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/01/04/141040.htmlThu, 04 Jan 2007 02:34:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/01/04/141040.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/141040.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2007/01/04/141040.html#Feedback21http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/141040.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/141040.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/11/11/126854.htmlSat, 11 Nov 2006 00:00:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/11/11/126854.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/126854.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/11/11/126854.html#Feedback6http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/126854.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/126854.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/08/31/97641.htmlWed, 30 Aug 2006 19:40:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/08/31/97641.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/97641.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/08/31/97641.html#Feedback13http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/97641.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/97641.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/07/15/79108.htmlFri, 14 Jul 2006 23:24:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/07/15/79108.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/79108.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/07/15/79108.html#Feedback6http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/79108.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/79108.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/06/30/75167.htmlFri, 30 Jun 2006 01:45:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/06/30/75167.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/75167.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/06/30/75167.html#Feedback13http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/75167.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/75167.html]]>張復http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/06/10/68939.htmlSat, 10 Jun 2006 07:01:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/06/10/68939.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/68939.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/archive/2006/06/10/68939.html#Feedback6http://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/comments/commentRss/68939.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/fchang/services/trackbacks/68939.html]]>