http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/電視崛起，報業沒落？新聞這一行，哪能分立體或平面，闖蕩平面媒體二十幾年，反而死心蹋地認 為台灣的電視新聞超沒深度，平面媒體更有深度與廣度經營的空間。從編輯台往外看，可能是一片藍天，也可能一片烏雲，更希望是一片春風。陳世昌zh-TW.Text Version 0.958.2004.214陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/11/12/562590.htmlFri, 12 Nov 2010 11:09:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/11/12/562590.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/562590.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/11/12/562590.html#Feedback298http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/562590.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/562590.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/08/28/533143.htmlSat, 28 Aug 2010 13:52:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/08/28/533143.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/533143.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/08/28/533143.html#Feedback150http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/533143.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/533143.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/05/29/503724.htmlSat, 29 May 2010 13:01:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/05/29/503724.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/503724.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/05/29/503724.html#Feedback176http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/503724.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/503724.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/01/24/467142.htmlSun, 24 Jan 2010 13:00:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/01/24/467142.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/467142.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2010/01/24/467142.html#Feedback129http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/467142.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/467142.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/11/22/449958.htmlSun, 22 Nov 2009 14:38:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/11/22/449958.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/449958.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/11/22/449958.html#Feedback111http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/449958.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/449958.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/10/17/441696.htmlSat, 17 Oct 2009 11:58:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/10/17/441696.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/441696.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/10/17/441696.html#Feedback39http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/441696.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/441696.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/08/17/425976.htmlSun, 16 Aug 2009 16:02:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/08/17/425976.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/425976.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/08/17/425976.html#Feedback60http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/425976.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/425976.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/05/15/404669.htmlFri, 15 May 2009 09:31:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/05/15/404669.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/404669.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/05/15/404669.html#Feedback88http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/404669.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/404669.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/03/23/387901.htmlSun, 22 Mar 2009 16:59:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/03/23/387901.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/387901.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/03/23/387901.html#Feedback86http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/387901.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/387901.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/03/18/386472.htmlWed, 18 Mar 2009 13:41:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/03/18/386472.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/386472.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2009/03/18/386472.html#Feedback1353http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/386472.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/386472.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/10/06/331219.htmlMon, 06 Oct 2008 13:25:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/10/06/331219.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/331219.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/10/06/331219.html#Feedback232http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/331219.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/331219.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/06/14/288122.htmlSat, 14 Jun 2008 13:37:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/06/14/288122.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/288122.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/06/14/288122.html#Feedback87http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/288122.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/288122.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/04/13/268661.htmlSun, 13 Apr 2008 14:31:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/04/13/268661.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/268661.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/04/13/268661.html#Feedback106http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/268661.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/268661.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/03/06/253814.htmlThu, 06 Mar 2008 13:26:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/03/06/253814.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/253814.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/03/06/253814.html#Feedback99http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/253814.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/253814.html陳世昌http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/01/11/234663.htmlFri, 11 Jan 2008 05:04:00 GMThttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/01/11/234663.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/234663.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/archive/2008/01/11/234663.html#Feedback125http://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/comments/commentRss/234663.htmlhttp://blog.chinatimes.com/elite/services/trackbacks/234663.html